The principles of Federalism are timeless. Liberals believe in the principle of subsidiarity: that power, where possible, should be located as close as possible to the people so that it is responsive to their demands. Liberals are wary of concentrating power in the hands of a small number of people. Liberals also believe in checks and balances – abolishing or rendering state governments impotent would leave a federal administration’s power virtually unchallenged.
Liberals also believe in competition. States competing for jobs, investment and talent should lead to lower taxes, lighter regulations and more attractive communities to live in.
He had better have a chat with Tony Abbott, who has different views about the issue:
My proposal is not to abolish the states but a referendum to give the national parliament the same authority over them that it's long had over the territories. It's not a bid for more power to Canberra. Rather, it's an attempt to establish clear lines of accountability and responsibility.
The Liberal Party is the erstwhile party of federalism: it certainly is no longer the ‘states rights’ party, as the Howard Government’s use of the corporations power to federalise Australia’s industrial relations laws illustrates.
The Fifield/Abbott discussion is a healthy one to have whilst a party is in opposition.
However, as we have previously discussed the Henry Review will raise the issue of whether Australia should be viewed as a federation or a single market, whilst in our previous article we noted the idea of whether state parliaments have a role in setting standards will be challenged as interested stakeholders challenge one size fits all legislation designed to bring about a ‘seamless economy’.
Both these developments and the fact that Australia is slowly lurching towards a federal election means that the Liberal Party will need to have some view as to how they see the federation operating – perhaps far sooner than they imagine.
No comments:
Post a Comment